<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sermon: A Mary to Believe in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlton-uca.org/news/2008/12/23/sermon-a-mary-to-believe-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlton-uca.org/news/2008/12/23/sermon-a-mary-to-believe-in/</link>
	<description>A Uniting Church in Carlton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 10:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivia</title>
		<link>http://carlton-uca.org/news/2008/12/23/sermon-a-mary-to-believe-in/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>olivia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlton-uca.org/news/?p=462#comment-2</guid>
		<description>We moderns know that women contribute half the genetic material to their offspring, which weakens the idea that Mary&#039;s virginal status allowed God to make life out of &#039;nothing.&#039;  A something-out-of-nothing hypothesis that relies, as the sermon suggests, on Mary&#039;s virginity, also relies on the pre-modern assumption that it&#039;s the man who puts the baby in the empty vessel.

If this theological interpretation is valid, we may conclude either the virgin-birth narrative was created to fit first-century notions of biology, or else it&#039;s an add-on interpretation unintended by the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We moderns know that women contribute half the genetic material to their offspring, which weakens the idea that Mary&#8217;s virginal status allowed God to make life out of &#8216;nothing.&#8217;  A something-out-of-nothing hypothesis that relies, as the sermon suggests, on Mary&#8217;s virginity, also relies on the pre-modern assumption that it&#8217;s the man who puts the baby in the empty vessel.</p>
<p>If this theological interpretation is valid, we may conclude either the virgin-birth narrative was created to fit first-century notions of biology, or else it&#8217;s an add-on interpretation unintended by the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
